Hiroshi.TEditor
UK cardholders make purchases with merchants located in Britain and abroad, but the proportion of those payments classified as online differs between the two groups. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) analysed aggregated, anonymised Visa card payments and reported that the international online spending ratio decreased by 10.4 percentage points between 2019 and 2024, reaching 61.0%, while the domestic online spending ratio rose by 6.4 points to 47.1%. These are the comparable annual findings highlighted in the ONS report published on 6 February 2026. They show that international merchants remained more online-intensive in the recorded dataset, even as the gap narrowed. They do not establish the total value of UK ecommerce or which country produces the goods or services purchased.
For a retailer or software company, the important analytical question is what online means in this particular dataset and how recorded merchant location is assigned. Card-payment channels are not the same as retail sales channels, and foreign merchant geography is not the same as the physical origin of the product. A customer might pay a UK shop through an app and collect the item locally. Another might pay a foreign merchant in person while travelling. These transactions enter different parts of the Visa breakdown, even if both involve modern payment technology. Keeping the definitions straight makes the research more useful for business decisions.
.jpeg)
Understand the ONS source before interpreting trends
The ONS report, Consumer card spending, e-commerce and digital trade insights in the UK: 2019 to 2025, explains that Visa provides aggregated and anonymised payments information about UK cardholders. The analysis separates online from face-to-face spending and identifies domestic and overseas merchants. Its headline annual comparison concerns 2019 and 2024, while some other figures within the publication extend to September 2025. A reader should not silently combine an annual observation with a monthly one to create a different trend. This rewrite focuses on the verifiable annual main-point series and avoids several more granular monthly percentages that were included in the older article without separately recoverable chart data.
What card-not-present means
The ONS uses card-not-present transactions as a basis for classifying online payments in this analysis. The category can cover purchases over the internet or in an app, but its exact statistical role is broader than the entire internationally agreed definition of ecommerce. For example, a business may take an order electronically and receive payment by bank transfer; that ecommerce order will not appear as a Visa card transaction. A telephone payment can also be made without presenting the physical card. Accordingly, online card spending is a useful indicator of some digital purchasing activity, not a count of every ecommerce order.
What makes an international merchant international
The recorded merchant's country is an attribute of the payment relationship. It does not necessarily identify where the company was founded or where the product was manufactured. A large software provider may use a regional entity for billing and another region for development or support. A booking platform may accept payments on behalf of accommodation providers operating elsewhere. The ONS definition is meaningful for payment geography, but it should not be transformed into unsupported claims about international production or cloud hosting. Supplier contracts and technical documentation are needed for those questions.
Why foreign merchants can have a high online share
Consumers frequently interact with overseas providers remotely. Digital services, international travel bookings and foreign ecommerce shops can be paid for without visiting a physical counter. That is a plausible reason why the observed foreign-merchant group contained a high proportion of online payments in the earlier years. However, it is not a controlled causal explanation of the reported change. Some international purchases occur in person when people travel. The relative amount spent on holidays, subscriptions and other merchant categories can change the aggregate share even when purchasing behaviour within each category changes little.
What the 61% figure says about 2024
The ONS states that the international online spending ratio reached 61% in 2024 following a decline of 10.4 percentage points from 2019. This means online payments still accounted for more than half of the relevant card spending at international merchants, under the source's definition. It does not mean that international digital purchasing fell by 10.4% in monetary value. The ratio could change because online and face-to-face spending grew at different rates. To test an explanation, analysts would need actual category spending values and comparable data for both channels rather than the headline ratio alone.
Domestic merchants show another pattern
The domestic online ratio reached 47.1% in 2024, up 6.4 percentage points from 2019, according to the same ONS main points. The population includes merchant types where customers may use physical and remote payment channels. The growth reflects a greater online portion of the covered domestic spending over the specified years, not necessarily an increase in every merchant's online order count. Some sectors are highly digital, while others still depend on in-person purchasing. The ONS aggregate cannot reveal the conversion rate of an individual shop, the success of a particular mobile checkout or a company's return rate.
Read the narrowing gap without assigning one cause
In 2024, the international ratio of 61.0% was 13.9 percentage points higher than the domestic ratio of 47.1%. The source shows that the difference between the groups narrowed compared with the earlier 2019 position. That is a descriptive result, not proof that international consumers lost interest in online services or that domestic shoppers adopted identical habits. Changes in tourism, travel services, merchant classification, payment instruments and consumer circumstances can all affect the observed mix. The headline shares do not isolate the contribution of each factor. A careful analysis distinguishes hypotheses about behaviour from statistics that directly describe payment outcomes.
Why the pandemic period needs context
The 2019–2024 comparison includes the COVID-19 pandemic, during which international travel and in-person purchasing opportunities were unusually disrupted. A straight line drawn between the endpoints hides movement in intervening years. The ONS report includes charts examining the full period rather than only one annual pair. Analysts should consult those underlying series before describing a stable rate of change. Using a five-year difference as a forecast for the next five years would assume that the same shocks and market responses recur, which is not supported by the reported evidence.
Do not equate a ratio with a total spending amount
Imagine a merchant category where £60 of every £100 in card spending occurs online. If the group grows to £200 of total spending but the online proportion falls to 50%, the amount spent online becomes £100, which is higher than before. This hypothetical example shows why a falling proportion does not necessarily imply a fall in the numerator. The ONS annual international ratio is a proportion within a specified merchant group. A retailer preparing a revenue forecast should obtain spending-value data and understand the category before making claims about cash transactions or ecommerce growth.
Merchant-category composition can distort simple stories
The international category contains distinct kinds of purchases. Travel services, digital subscriptions, physical goods and other merchants can each have different online-versus-in-person patterns. As their relative weight changes, the overall ratio can move without a consistent shift in every sector. The domestic group has its own composition, and the difference in mix complicates direct interpretation. Comparing the two as though they were identical collections of shops in different countries would obscure this limitation. Source labels, merchant classification and observation date are indispensable when a chart is reproduced in a business proposal.
Understand the limits of Visa coverage
Visa captures only part of consumer spending. Cash, other card networks, bank transfers and alternative arrangements are not all observed in the same dataset. The ONS notes that its Visa information is aggregated and anonymised and applies statistical disclosure controls where necessary. Researchers cannot infer a complete national payment total or a country-by-country supplier map from this partial source. Despite those limits, the data offer valuable insights that conventional surveys may miss, especially about international card transactions. The right conclusion is bounded relevance, not that the series has no research value.
How this relates to digital trade
The international Handbook on Measuring Digital Trade separates digitally ordered and digitally delivered transactions. A physical product bought on an overseas website is digitally ordered but not digitally delivered; software access can be both. A Visa transaction classified as online and international captures only a subset of these wider trade concepts. The ONS discusses that distinction explicitly. An analyst studying software imports, for example, needs more than merchant-location card figures to identify where the service is supplied or how it reaches users.
Implications for checkout and payment systems
A UK ecommerce business dealing with international customers or suppliers should design payment flows that distinguish card authorisation, order acceptance, capture, settlement and any later refund. Currency conversion, regional issuer rules and acquiring arrangements can create errors that are invisible in a national card proportion. A retry after a timeout should not create a duplicate transaction. Reconciliation should use stable identifiers and authoritative results from the payment provider and order system. Statistical observations can help motivate a resilient payment design but cannot tell developers the correct integration parameters for an individual merchant.
Use the measures carefully in management reports
If reporting the annual international and domestic shares, include both numbers, their 2019–2024 comparison, the Visa scope and the ONS release date. State that each percentage concerns online spending within its own merchant-location population. If another page cites 50.5% for all consumer card spending in September 2025, explain that it has a different denominator and refers to a different time point. An accurate title can prevent misleading comparisons before readers reach the footnotes. Do not label the data as a complete census of UK ecommerce or physical imports.
Practical supplier checks for businesses
Use the evidence as a prompt to review how overseas providers handle billing, tax, subscription ownership and customer support. Verify the legal contracting entity, invoice currency, renewal schedule and applicable data-protection arrangements. Where a merchant uses intermediaries or a regional billing company, make the relationship understandable to procurement and finance teams. A card transaction's geography cannot establish whether an overseas service meets UK regulatory or security expectations. Those require contract-level diligence and independent technical checks appropriate to the nature of the product.
The balanced conclusion
The ONS 2019–2024 analysis documents an international online card spending share of 61% and a domestic share of 47.1%, following opposite movements from their 2019 baselines. The source provides a valuable account of how payment channels differ across recorded merchant locations. The figures should not be used as direct evidence of total sales value, software origins or individual retailer performance. An evidence-led interpretation keeps the correct denominator, timescale, card-network limits and trade definitions visible, allowing businesses to ask better payment and procurement questions without pretending the dataset answers everything.
Primary sources: ONS Visa consumer card analysis, published 6 February 2026, main points and methods; OECD/IMF/UNCTAD/WTO Digital Trade Handbook, 2023.